Breaks between deadlines whether professional or academic
have proven to be ideal brainstorming, creative, and productive
opportunities. For instance, when I had
a break between working in an office 45 hours per week and beginning this
master’s program, I was obsessed with industrial design and
entrepreneurship. That is, anything
which could provide passive income to alleviate 45 hours of sitting in a chair,
while still expressing design and creativity.
Now, during this academic pause, I have had time to continue
research of my thesis without forced deadlines.
Still, I look forward to the next semester as deadlines and
accountability is equally important to me as intermittent, uncontrolled
brainstorming. My preliminary thesis topic
of an urban development which can grow and adapt congruent to its surrounding
context with a strong interest in maintaining a neighborhoods culture is
becoming in itself adaptable and open for manipulation. That is, the abstract changes slightly based on
my latest research. Lately, I have been
investigating two architects, O.M. Ungers, and Stephane Malka. Though just speculation, Malka seems to have
been largely inspired by Ungers’ writings on “Grossform,” and “Parasitic
Architecture.” One of Malka’s latest
proposals is a response to a worldwide urban issue of rural flight. With more and more rural populations moving
into the city, developers are rushing to accommodate. Malka’s P9-Ghetto Mobile, is an answer to the
aforementioned urban crisis utilizing mass production and customization.
Malka’s proposal aims to integrate otherwise wealthier
architectural typologies into overlooked urban spaces. This architectural installation can be
disassembled and relocated. The units
are assembled onto a scaffolding, and provide residences, offices, galleries,
shops, etc. This “Micro-City,” can be
assembled in unlimited configurations, and adapted to its surrounding context.
The site
I have chosen for my thesis is perfect for exploring these notions of
architecture on demand, and the introduction of time and architecture. The West
Loop, specifically Fulton Market, has recently published an Innovative
Land Use Plan as a guideline for future development. Although this plan is necessary to help
mitigate bad development, it seems to be encouraging haphazard contextualism. For instance, one guiding design requirement
according to the land use plan is to maintain existing historical street
frontage. If I’m wearing my developer
hat, this means, traditional ornamental masonry base for two stories, and a
modern marketable residential tower on top.
Is that solution really the answer to maintaining an areas culture and
heritage? How would a Mies
residential tower feel contextually if it were retrofitted on top of an
historic masonry podium? My goal for the
next few months is to investigate these questions among many other urban
issues. Steven Holl recollects Louis
Sullivan in a conversation
with Lebbeus Woods as Louis being on his death bed explaining that if he lives
long enough, he will see all of his buildings being torn down, but that it’s
only the philosophy and ideas that will live on.