By: Colleen O’Malley
Last semester our architecture studio was assigned to redesign the legacy site for the 2016 Olympics which will be held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This complex project included class research, group master planning, and individual programing for housing or a hotel. For many of us, this was the largest project we had the opportunity to design for. For this reason, I faced many hurdles that I can now apply to future projects. This class was also a comprehensive studio which meant we were to not only design the building and its functional program, but we were required to work out the mechanical, plumbing, codes, structure, egress, etc. The process of a comprehensive studio was very challenging, but extremely rewarding. While reading, I came across this article about the past Olympics and how not to design for the big event. I thought this article was very interesting and my classmates and other viewers would enjoy it as well.
How (Not) To Host The Olympics
So – you want to be an Olympic City do you? Well let’s hope you’re going for gold.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fd59/0fd598a55b9f507e00accba4401541528f60e034" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25122/251226df7b688ba8a32e92e5d637489763339853" alt=""
We’ll begin with the GOLDEN RULE: “The best thing to do if you’re bidding for the Olympics, Is to Not Get the Olympics.”
Now, why is the GOLDEN RULE important? It’s a question of attitude.
If you jump onto the Olympic bandwagon with half-baked ideas, blinded by glory, you’ll be headed for disaster. The key to “beating” the Olympic Games is to bid as if you’re not going to get them: to merely see the Olympics as the catalyst by which you’ll speed up your (already existent) plans for Urban Renewal.
Which leads us to our first DON’T: Design “White Elephants“
No Architect would care to have his/her design for the crowning symbol of the Games, the Olympic Stadium, described as “Tragically underwhelming” (as London’s Olympic Stadium was critiqued by The Times critic Tom Dyckhoffof). But better “Tragically Underwhelming” than “Tragically Useless.” Olympic Stadiums, for their colossal size and subsequent high cost of maintenance, often end up enormous, tenant-less, economic drains on their cities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c872f/c872f409f7f4f296403631f6306765e3c2e34baf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06fa5/06fa5bcd86e56621240a7067505088128f0fd435" alt=""
DO: Place Post-Use As The Priority
But how can it be avoided, you say? The International Olympic Committee (IOC) demands a state-of-the-art stadium large enough to house thousands for the opening/closing ceremonies. It must accomodate athletics of all types – from track to the javelin throw. And, most importantly, the Stadium is the most blatant symbol of your Country’s awesomeness. It must be BIG. But that’s not to say that it can’t be smart. The most important rule to designing the Olympic Stadium, and really any Olympic building in general, is to design with conversion in mind.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8c00/e8c00685c1c46da47759ffaafaf5529364c00e5a" alt=""
From the beginning, Atlanta’s Stadium’s ”destiny was baseball, not the Olympics,” according to Stan Kasten, the former president of the Braves, who took ownership of the Stadium after the Games. The Braves spent about $40 million (relatively cheap in Stadium-talk) to convert the Stadium into Turner Field, and Kasten notes,”Thirty million people have used it since the Olympics.”
Moreover, Atlanta placed many of its structures near a University, Georgia Tech, who then subsumed the facilities for student-use. Beijing did the same, and went one step further by designing its fencing hall, Indoor Stadium, and Olympic Village as convertible spaces (they are now a conference center, an arts & entertainment center, and private residences).
Which is exactly why the London stadium is in a bit of a pickle right now. With football (soccer) the national obsession, the obvious choice for its future-use would be as a Football Stadium. But, the 80,000 seat stadium has yet to find an occupant (a process that should have finished on May 21st). As one potential bidder put it, the Stadium is just “not fit for football,” as it lacks the tiered-seating and intimacy of a Football arena.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Your Stadium’s Not a Sprint, it’s a Marathon. Design for the post-Olympic long haul.
Reference: http://www.archdaily.com/242480/how-not-to-host-the-olympics/
No comments:
Post a Comment