By: Ken Howder
For information
on climate zones within the U.S. I was given a detailed book on the study of
sustainable facades written by Ajla Aksamija titled, simply, Sustainable
Facades. According to Aksamija, building
facades serve the dual-purposes of improving occupant comfort and creating the
look for the building in which it serves.
When all else considered, these two functions can be determined as the
central idea every building that is to be designed in the architecture
profession.
A typical basis
for the design of a building’s façade is the climate zone in which it is to be
built. The author describes this process
in depth and classifies the possibilities of 8 different climate zones. These zones include: Very Hot, Hot, Warm,
Mixed, Cool, Cold, Very Cold, and Subarctic.
Similarly, each zone come with an added humidity category of humid, dry,
or marine. These zones throughout the
United States can be seen in the following figure.
(Map of us
climates, Aksamija pg. 7)
There are
several differing strategies per climate zone that a designer needs to consider
when planning a building’s efficiency factors.
Aksamija explains, “In choosing design strategies, we need to consider
the conditions of the climate zone to minimize their impacts and reduce energy
consumption. In Table 1-3, we see how
design strategies are affected by climate types” (Aksamija, 2010, pg. 10).
Basic design
strategies include: “Orienting and developing geometry and massing of the
building to respond to solar position, providing solar shading to control
cooling loads and improve thermal comfort, using natural ventilation to reduce
cooling loads and enhance air quality, and minimizing energy used for
artificial lighting and mechanical cooling and heating by optimizing exterior
wall insulation and the use of daylighting”
(Aksamija, pg. 9).
The information
and techniques acquired from this book gave me the idea for individual study of
climate zone façade design with the control subject being the exact same
building shell. It is indeed a
necessity, for efficient building skins to be present within each of the
climate zones individually. However,
there is not a cookie-cutter solution that can be applied to all climate zones
and be effective. This lead to the idea
of separating my designs into three different climate categories: Hot,
temperate, and cold (there are several more, but these have differences
relevant enough to produce an effective study).
Finally the concept of designing the same building (with the same
program and requirements) for the three different climate zones individually to
study the differences and relationships that will be present when creating
efficient buildings in these different zones.
All of these basic design strategies are directly related to the outer
envelope of a building.
No comments:
Post a Comment