BY SUFIY MOMOH
Design in architecture in our world today is
depicted by so many limiting factors which restricts the design part of the
profession to a point where designing is almost not a part of the profession. Architecture
is generally described as an art of designing and constructing buildings. In
what is called architecture in today's world you can barely refer to it as an
art. Art is an act of creativity. How much in today's architecture is an act of
creativity? Very little because architects have refused to push their thoughts
and idea beyond what was already the norms of architecture, that is the already
known means of doing things in today's architecture.
Architects have so many factors and limits
restricting the outcome of the profession and that are one of the main reasons
why the creative and artistic aspect of the profession is going down the drain.
Is architecture all about problem solving? Yes for the most part. But the
problems being solved in the architecture industry today are not necessary the
ones that should be worried about. Structures commissioned by the government
are mostly for the people, but architects are more interested in pleasing the
people in charge of or the people involved in the commissioning. people in high
government positions are chosen to represent the people, that is a well
understood fact, but in a case where an architect designs a public building as
an architect you should understand what is best for the people and design
something that works best for its purpose and not what the government authority
wants.
Various personnel out of the profession have
developed a lot of say and impact of how things should be done within the
profession and architects are left with no choice but to oblige with it because
in most cases, that is their only source of income. Architects
have been doing this for so long that now it feels more like a norm to be under
these sorts of limits. When this limits are removed it appears that architect
execute less. And this is mainly because they are not used to do working under
that kind of condition.
It has been several cases where architect have
opposed to the ideas of the authority in charge for the better of the project
and most of them end up losing the contract. “Most of us remember, for example,
what happened to Mr. Koolhaas in the 1997 competition for a major expansion to
the Museum of Modern Art. Choosing to ignore the museum’s internal politics, he
indiscreetly highlighted the museum’s corporate agenda in his design. An
enraged MoMA board instantly dropped him." (paul, 1991). This is a typical
example of where the profession is. mr koolhaas is a well recognized architect
from Netherland, who is well known as one of the most influential architects in
the world. This is a typical example of where the profession is today. If the architects can’t beat them they are
left with no option but to join them.
No comments:
Post a Comment